Mark Allen, Ph.D. is the Academic Director of the Master of Science in Human Resources at Pepperdine’s Business School. According to an article he referenced in The Real Costs of Bad Management-And What You Can Do About It bad management can lead to death:
If decreased productivity and
increased turnover aren’t reasons enough to stop the practice of having bad
managers, consider this: bad managers lead to increased stress, major health
issues, and even death.
Toxic
management practice leads to decreased productivity, increased turnover,
increased stress to employees, major health issues and even death. He quotes an
article written by Jeffrey Pfeffer, Professor of Organizational Behavior at
Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business, and author of the book, Dying
For A Paycheck. Pfeffer co-authored a paper1
in Management Science where he and his co-authors built a model to estimate
factors for mortality and health expenditures associated with exposure to
workplace stressors including unemployment, long working hours, low
organizational justice.
Their conservative estimates found that in the U.S. more than
120,000 deaths per year and the related extra health care costs were $190B of
annual health care costs could be attributed to harmful management
practices. They conclude, “Our results
suggest that more attention should be paid to management practices as important
contributors to health outcomes and costs in the United States.” This, they
say, makes the workplace the fifth leading cause of death annually.
What I hear from these results is that there should be more
accountability to how human capital is managed, and organizations should look
at how power over others’ lives is wielded in the workplace. The alternative
could be fatal.
In own
article, “The Real Costs of Bad Management” Allen says:
What astounds me is that organizations still blindly accept
the premise that having bad managers is a routine and inevitable cost of doing
business. I wonder if this would be as acceptable if our executives knew the
true costs: lost productivity, turnover of high performing employees, $190
billion in healthcare costs, and 120,000 annual deaths. So what can we do about
this problem, a problem which can now accurately be called an epidemic?
In addition to the potential of creating unhealthy
environments and contributing to employee illness, toxic organizations have
tangible costs. Employee turnover costs companies one and one-half times the
employee’s salary, says Allen. Based on this information in the following table
I have created a snapshot of the manager’s salary, the employee’s salary, and
the cost impact of replacing two employees and four employees within a 12-month
period.
The point of the table below is to name the costs to an organization from a manager who has high staff turnover; whether through firings or
employees leaving. A manager’s salary
may be $75,000, but if they have to replace a role or roles twice in the same
year, which is not uncommon, and the employee makes, say, $60K, that manager is
costing the organization $180,000 which is 140 percent of their own salary.
Not only are they costing their organization employees, but they are costing
the organization in decreased productivity due to the downward
trajectory of morale by the employees who witness what the poor supervisor is
able to get away with and how they are able to drive out talent.
Manager/Sup.
Sal. |
Employee
Sal. |
Cost to
replace employees 2x in 12 mos. |
Cost to
replace employees 4x in 12 mos. |
0 |
0 |
12 mos. |
12 mos. |
40,000 |
25,000 |
75,000 |
150,000 |
65,000 |
50,000 |
150,000 |
300,000 |
90,000 |
75,000 |
225,000 |
450,000 |
120,000 |
100,000 |
200,000 |
400,000 |
In “The Real Costs of Bad Management” Allen talks about the phrase well-known in the business arena: People don’t leave organizations, they leave managers”. He says where companies refer to “employee engagement”, this can be tricky. He says, “bad managers lead to low engagement. Low engagement leads to declining productivity and higher turnover.”
Allen says
the first step in addressing the problem is to admit there is a problem. In my
personal experience, organizations that are well-aware of toxic management and
leadership too often prefer to not acknowledge a problem. If the problem comes
to a head, it’s easier to get rid of the lower-level employee and to leave the
supervisor or manager in their role. The happens even when the employee is a
perfectly high-functioning individual; the person in the position of power is
the one who gets to retain their job, even if they are contributing to an
exodus of staff. Allen says, “I believe that
the greatest source of dysfunction in our organizations is the abundance of bad
managers. They cost us productivity and drive away our talent. But this is also
our greatest area of opportunity.”
Allen offers a solution to creating a better environment
which he says is to choose the right people to manage other human beings. Just
as you wouldn’t hire an accountant with no aptitude for the job, and no
experience, nor an engineer without the same, don’t hire someone without the
interest and aptitude for managing people. He says it’s also important to ask
people if they want to manage others, because the ones that want to do so may
be the folks with an aptitude for managing your greatest asset – your
employees.
Sources:
The
Relationship Between Workplace Stressors and Mortality and Health Costs in the
United States. By
Joel Goh, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Stefanos Zenios. Management Science. March 13, 2016, Vol.
62, Issue 2, Pages 608-628. (https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/publications/relationship-between-workplace-stressors-mortality-health-costs-united) 1
Allen,
Mark (2019). The Real Costs of Bad
Management-And What You Can Do About It. Graziado Business Review 22(1).
https://gbr.pepperdine.edu/2019/03/the-real-costs-of-bad-management-and-what-you-can-do-about-it/ 2
No comments:
Post a Comment